缅北禁地

Day Two - Session 4: Parallel breakout sessions - Protecting the rights of victims of terrorism

Banner of the Day Two Programme page of the 缅北禁地Global Congress of Victims of Terrorism

Session 4: Parallel breakout sessions - Protecting the rights of victims of terrorism

10:55?- 11:55

?

Victims of terrorism and their families have rights related to remedy and reparation that are articulated in international human rights and humanitarian law, regional standards, and domestic legislation. As such, the General Assembly has emphasized Member States’ commitments to those rights, particularly in resolution 73/305. This session gave an overview on the status of the protection and promotion of the rights of victims of terrorism, progress made in recent years by Member States and the international community, and existing challenges.

?

Breakout session 4 A: Protecting the right to privacy of victims of terrorism

Quick Links: Session and Statements | Speakers | Survey

?

Breakout session 4 B: Protecting against threats to physical and psychological integrity

Quick Links: Session and Statements | Speakers | Survey

?


Breakout session 4 A: Protecting the right to privacy of victims of terrorism

11:00 - 11:55

Room: CR.4

?

Reporting and information-sharing on terrorist attacks, including by authorities, the media, as well as social media platforms have a profound impact on victims’ right to privacy, and may lead to additional trauma or even exploitation. The victims’ right to privacy may be limited in the interest of satisfying the public’s right to receive accurate information in the aftermath of a terrorist attack, but only to the narrowest extent that it is necessary. Media exposure of victims can create a platform for public discussions, how to further support victims, and “humanise” those who have been affected by terrorism, as well as for the mobilization of popular support of victims. It can also have a positive role in supporting victims’ right to be recognized as such, including the right to truth and information. However, in the immediate aftermath of a terrorist attack, victims often face overwhelming attention from both the general public and the media which can lead to breaches of privacy of the victims and their families which can have a profound impact on their long-term well-being. This session discussed how to protect the right to privacy of victims of terrorism while ensuring the rights to freedom of expression and access to information of public interest. It also looked at the roles of the State and of the media in protecting privacy and consider broader digital protection issues for victims of terrorism in an age of social media.

?

Session and Statements for Breakout session 4 A

Time Sessions

Friday, 09 September
11:00 – 11:55

Moderator:

  • Dr. Ilia Siatitsa, Programme Director and Senior Legal Officer, Privacy International

Panelists:

  • Ms. Figen Murray, Director, Survivors Against Terrorism and victim of terrorism, United Kingdom?
  • Ms. Nidhi Chaphekar, victim of terrorism, India
  • Mr. Nicholas Rasmussen, Executive Director, Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism
  • Mr. Dapo Olorunyomi, Chief Executive, Nigeria Premium Times, Nigeria

Questions and Observations from the floor

Interventions

  • Mr. Jorge Nelson Amado Monteiro, Commander of the Special Police Unit of the National Police of Timor-Leste and Superintendent and Commander of Criminal Investigation of the National Police of Timor-Leste
  • Mr. Rio Hada, Chief, Equality, development, and rule of law section, Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights
  • Mr. Mark Wallace, Co-founder of Sarz Sanctuary and victim of terrorism, Australia

Breakout session 4 B: Protecting against threats to physical and psychological integrity

10:55 - 11:50

Room: CR.1

?

In order to fulfil their obligations under human rights law to protect the life and security of individuals under their jurisdiction, States have both a right and a duty to take effective counter-terrorism measures, to prevent and deter future terrorist attacks and to prosecute those that are responsible for carrying out such acts. This includes ensuring victims’ safety from intimidation and retaliation, as well as that of their families and witnesses before, during, and after judicial, administrative, or other proceedings that affect the interests of victims. States should also take measures to protect against secondary victimization, which is victimization that occurs through the response of institutions and individuals to the victim. This session identified?human rights-based good practices to minimize, prevent and protect victims of terrorism from the above threats and abuses, in different contexts and across different stages of the victims’ healing process, including the role of CSOs and private actors in supporting these good practices.

?

Session and Statements for Breakout session 4 B

Time Sessions

Friday, 09 September
10:55 – 11:50

Moderator:

  • Prof. Jeanne Sulzer, International Human Rights Lawyer, Law Professor and consultant at United Nations Office of Counter-Terrorism, United Nations Counter-Terrorism Centre

Panelists:

  • Mr. Tomás Caballero Martinez, President, Victims of Terrorism Foundation and victim of terrorism, Spain
  • Mr. Max Boon, Founder, Victims’ Voices Initiative and victim of terrorism, The Netherlands
  • Ms. Susilaningtias S. H., Deputy Chair/Commissioner LPSK, Witness and Victim Protection Agency, Indonesia
  • Ms. Odette Chesnot, Founder, Lebanese Association of Victims of Terrorism, Lebanon

Questions and Observations from the floor

Interventions

  • Ms. Erik Mortensen, Board Member of the Norwegian National Support Group after 22 July and victim of terrorism, Norway
  • Ms. Terry Sears, Executive Director of Tuesday's Children and victim of terrorism, United States of America
  • Mr. Lev Altan, Executive Director, Victim's Support Europe
  • Mr. Matthew Lamberth, Federal Agent of the Australian Federal Police and victim of terrorism, Australia

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?