UNAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. As a preliminary matter, UNAT noted that both parties agreed that a redaction of name would only be justified if the UNDT鈥檚 judgment was affirmed. UNAT held that UNDT erred when it considered that the identification of Mr. Mobanga by the complainant in the photo array was not reliable on the basis that the use of MONUSCO grounds passes in the array may have influenced the complainant. Noting that all of the photos were marked 鈥淢ONUSCO鈥 and so it did not stand out or influence anyone, UNAT held that the photographs constituted evidence that...