Disciplinary matters / misconduct
Assault (verbal and physical)
Dismissal/separation
Evidence
Corroboration/hearsay
Separation from service
Termination of appointment (see also, Termination of appointment)
Standard of proof
Termination (of appointment)
Disciplinary sanction
UNAT held that UNDT was correct not to conclude that the Appellant had initiated the physical fight. UNAT held that UNDT was entitled to conclude the evidence of a witness was not clear and convincing, given inconsistencies. UNAT held that UNDT determined correctly that a prior altercation could not provide propensity evidence to corroborate witnesses’ accounts of the physical fight because the prior altercation was not investigated properly. UNAT held that UNDT committed an error in concluding that the Appellant had been unduly influenced into signing the settlement agreement, but that UNDT...