Non-disciplinary
Bias/favouritism
Admissibility
Corroboration/hearsay
Sole testimony of complainant
Full and fair consideration
Interview
Burden of proof
Discrimination and other improper motives
Evidence
Staff selection (non-selection/non-promotion)
UNAT first explained that this is a case where the UNDT should have held a hearing to determine the states of mind of those persons who decided that the Staff Member should not have been placed on the roster. The Tribunal defined bias as follows: (paras. 29 - 32) "29. Bias is an element of natural justice which examines not only the mind of the decision‑maker subjectively, but the manifestation of the process of decision-making examined objectively. Put another way, a decision is not only biased if made by a decision‑maker deliberately intending to favour or disadvantage the subject of it for...