The Respondent contended that the Applicant鈥檚 appointment was not renewed because of financial and staffing considerations, namely the ending of temporary funding for the Applicant鈥檚 position. The Applicant contended that this reason was not legitimate and that the decision was tainted by discrimination and based on other factors that were not disclosed to him. The Applicant claimed that the Respondent created an expectancy of renewal of his appointment as a result of the promises given to him by his supervisor. He further submitted that his due process rights were violated during an...