Right to a hearing
Right to appeal
Time limit
Selection decision
Jurisdiction / receivability (UNAT)
Procedure (first instance and UNAT)
Due process
Management Evaluation
Staff selection (non-selection/non-promotion)
Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance)
Procedure (first instance and UNAT)
UNAT held that the Appellant’s consent to foregoing an in-person hearing was not required, pursuant to Rule 22 of the ICAO Appeals Board Rules and ICAO Staff Rule 111.1(18). The Appellant was advised by the ICAO Appeals Board of its intention to proceed with a summary decision and she participated in this process by making submissions without objecting to it. Therefore, it was not an error of law for the Appeals Board of ICAO to have considered and decided the summary judgment without an in-person hearing but otherwise in compliance with due process requirements of participation therein by...