2010-UNAT-015, Macharia
UNAT considered the Appellant’s appeal and found that she did not demonstrate that her request for an extension of time was reasonable. UNAT found that the evidence about negotiations being contemplated, needed, or underway was previously refuted on appeal. UNAT noted that the Appellant had the time and the assistance of legal counsel to advance her application and did not avail herself of those opportunities. UNAT accordingly dismissed the appeal.
The Applicant was dismissed from her post for serious misconduct. She applied an extension of the time limit to challenge dismissal and UNDT granted her 21 days. The Applicant then applied for a one-year extension, which UNDT denied. UNDT found that she had not adduced evidence to show that negotiations are ongoing as stated in her application and noted that it would be an abuse of process for the Applicant to indulge in frivolous and unending applications for extension of time where she is more inclined to ignore orders granted her in a previous application.
Left deliberately blank