2010-UNAT-023

2010-UNAT-023, Nock

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT affirmed the UNJSPB’s decision denying the staff member’s request for restoration of her first participation period. UNAT found that the amended Article 24 of the UNJSPF’s Regulations only allowed for restoration of a participant’s most recent period of contributory service and that the staff member had requested restoration of a participation period which was not the most recent one.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The staff member (who re-entered the UNJSPF for the third time) requested the restoration of her first participation period. The UNJSPF Secretariat informed her that her request would not be granted since her first participation period was not her “most recent period of contributory service”.

Legal Principle(s)

Amended Article 24 of the UNJSPF Regulations provides for a participant’s option to restore his/ her prior contributory service. However, it only allows for restoration of most recent period of contributory service.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits
Outcome Extra Text

No relief was ordered.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Nock
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type