Ãå±±½ûµØ

2011-UNAT-188

2011-UNAT-188, Harding

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. UNAT held that the compensation awarded to Ms Harding for the loss of salary and other entitlements from the date of her dismissal to the date of the UNDT judgment with interest was excessive. UNAT held that it must take into account that she received compensation on or around 18 February 2008 and it could not consider the loss of earnings as actual harm after that date when the non-reinstatement was known to the claimant and the offered compensation caused by that circumstance had already been paid. UNAT held that a total of 2. 5 years’ net base salary constituted adequate compensation of all of her claims. UNAT upheld the appeal and reduced Ms Harding’s compensation to a total of two years and six months’ net base salary, plus the special post allowance which was not appealed.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to summarily dismiss her for serious misconduct in the form of submitting fraudulent medical insurance claims for reimbursement. The Joint Disciplinary Committee (JDC) found that the decision was flawed by factual errors and violations of due process rights and recommended rescission, reinstatement and compensation. The High Commissioner accepted the findings of the JDC and decided to pay her two years’ net base salary as compensation in lieu of reinstatement in addition to six months’ net base salary for the violation of her due process rights. UNDT, limiting itself to the issue of compensation, upheld the decision, awarding an additional six months’ salary for moral compensation; all salaries and entitlements due to her up until the date of the UNDT judgment; and Special Post Allowance (SPA), with interest, for a four-month mission.

Legal Principle(s)

The period of compensation for loss of earnings resulting from dismissal should be limited to two years, except where compelling reasons would lead to a different judgment, and that compensation must be calculated taking into account the net base salary and entitlements not related to actual service performance after deducting any salaries and entitlements that the staff member received during the period considered, based on the situation as at the beginning of that period.

Outcome
Appeal granted

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.