2012-UNAT-202, Buscaglia
UNAT held that UNDT was correct in finding that the statement dated 26 November 2003 was neither a decision to terminate the Appellant’s appointment nor a disciplinary measure. UNAT held that the statement was merely a publicly stated opinion which had no legal consequences on the Appellant who, in addition to having already been informed on 29 October 2003 that his contract would not be renewed beyond 30 November 2003, had also declared that he would not be able or willing to continue working for UNODC after his contract expired. UNAT accordingly dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNDT judgment.
The Applicant requested administrative review and a suspension of action regarding the Executive Director’s statement from 26 November 2003, which stated that the Applicant would not have a future with the Organisation. UNDT found that, given that the Applicant had already been informed on 29 October 2003 of the decision not to renew his appointment, the ensuing 26 November 2003 statement by the Executive Director in the UNODC press release could not be considered to be either a decision not to renew his appointment, or a disciplinary measure.
A statement with no legal consequences to a staff member will not be regarded as a disciplinary measure.