2013-UNAT-326, Jibara
UNAT considered an appeal by the Commissioner-General and a cross-appeal by Mr Jibara. UNAT held that UNRWA DT lacked jurisdiction to decide on the scope of the Oslo Accords signed by Israel and the Palestinian National Authority or the legality of the detention and imprisonment. UNAT recalled that it was not the role of UNDT to substitute its own decision for that of the Administration. UNAT recalled that, having established misconduct and the seriousness of the incident, UNAT cannot review the level of a sanction imposed except in cases of obvious absurdity or flagrant arbitrariness. UNAT upheld the appeal and vacated the UNRWA DT judgment.
UNRWA DT judgment: The Applicant contested the termination of his contract with UNRWA after his conviction and imprisonment for weapons possession. UNRWA DT found for the Applicant, setting aside the decision to terminate his service and ordered his reinstatement or, as an alternative, compensation in the amount equivalent to two years’ net base salary.
It is not the role of UNDT to substitute its own decision for that of the Administration. Having established misconduct and the seriousness of an incident, UNAT cannot review the level of sanction imposed except in cases of obvious absurdity or flagrant arbitrariness.
No relief ordered; No relief ordered.