Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2009/051

UNDT/2009/051, Costa

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Dispute Tribunal may suspend or waive the deadlines for the filing of applications imposed by the Statute and Rules of Procedure, but may not suspend or waive the deadlines in the Staff Rules concerning management evaluation because this is the prerogative of the Secretary-General.The drafters of the Statute of the Dispute Tribunal intended that all applications to the Tribunal would be subject to the rules under which this Tribunal operates. Therefore, pursuant to Article 8.3 of the Statute, the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to extend the deadlines for the filing of requests for administrative review from before 1 July 2009. Outcome: The application is not receivable under Article 8.3 of the Statute of the Tribunal.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The applicant, a language teacher, is contesting the Administration’s decision to reject her request for overtime compensation. In 2007, the applicant’s department decided to test a new system to evaluate the performance of students. After this pilot project was completed in January 2008, the applicant requested compensation for the overtime she had performed while working with the new system. Her request was denied. The applicant filed an application with the Dispute Tribunal.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.