Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2010/125

UNDT/2010/125, Teferra

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

While the Respondent submits that the recognized heads of damage are: actual pecuniary loss; damages for procedural error and moral damages, the Tribunal does not consider this list to be exhaustive. The Tribunal cannot conclude that if proper procedures had been followed, the Applicant would have been selected for the subject post. Nonetheless, it considers that the Applicant’s prospect for selection was very high due to the fact that he was the only candidate deemed suitable for the post by the Advisory Selection Panel. Thus, the contested decision impacts substantially on the Applicant’s life in that he lost the opportunity to move to the G-7 level and as such, he is entitled to compensation for the lost opportunity

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant is a staff member of the Economic Commission for Africa who is contesting the decision to re-advertise the vacancy for the post of Mail Assistant (Registry Supervisor) at the G-7 level. The facts giving rise to the application before the Tribunal are contained in UNDT Judgment No. 084 (2010). In the said Judgment, having found in favor of the Applicant, the Tribunal directed the parties to provide written submissions as to the appropriate relief that should be ordered.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part
Outcome Extra Text

The Respondent is ordered to pay the Applicant three months’ net base salary as compensation for the loss of the opportunity to be appointed to the post of Mail Assistant at the G-7 level with interest at 8% beginning 90 days from the date of issuance of this Judgment until payment is effected.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Teferra
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type