UNDT/2011/142

UNDT/2011/142, Gehr

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal finds that the restructuring constituted a valid exercise of the Respondent’s discretionary authority, that the Applicant’s post was not abolished as he was in fact reassigned against the same budgeted post, and that his reassignment was lawful. Definition of a “post”: A “post” may be defined as the financial authorization given for a job to be performed, irrespective of the fact that it may be funded through budgetary or extra budgetary sources. Discretion of the Secretary-General in the organization of work: The Secretary-General enjoys broad discretion in the organization of work and the assignment of tasks to staff members. Such discretion is not unfettered but is subject to limited control by the Tribunal.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Following a restructuring of his branch in early 2010, the Applicant, a UNOV/UNODC staff member, was reassigned, at the same level, to the newly created position of Senior Legal Adviser. Before the Tribunal, he challenges the decisions to abolish his post and to reassign him to the position of Senior Legal Adviser.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.