Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2013/046

UNDT/2013/046, Al-Mulla

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that the decision to consider the Applicant as ineligible was legal and did not violate any of his rights.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant, a P-3 staff member, appealed the decision of OHRM to find him ineligible to contest for a P-5 post with UNODC.

Legal Principle(s)

Eligibility requirements: Staff members holding a permanent, continuing, probationary or fixed-term appointment shall not be eligible to apply for positions more than one level higher than their personal grade.

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Al-Mulla
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type