Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2019/177

UNDT/2019/177, Dahir

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The United Nations Dispute Tribunal had no jurisdiction to adjudicate on the Applicant’s dispute with ICAO.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant challenged ICAO’s failure to compensate her for the injuries sustained during the course of duty.

Legal Principle(s)

An ICAO staff member who is dissatisfied with the decision of the AJAB would then have the right to challenge the latter’s decision before the United Nations Appeals Tribunal.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Dahir
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type