UNAT considered Mr Paskolti’s application for revision of former Ãå±±½ûµØAdministrative Tribunal judgment No. 1459. UNAT held that Article 11 of the UNAT Statute and Article 24 of the UNAT Rules of Procedure did not confer jurisdiction on UNAT to review a judgment of the former Ãå±±½ûµØAdministrative Tribunal. UNAT dismissed the application for revision on the grounds of non-receivability.
Article 24
-
Article 1.2(c)
1
-
Article 10.1
2
-
Article 10.2
9
-
Article 10.5
11
-
Article 10.5(a)
5
-
Article 10.5(b)
5
-
Article 10.6
10
-
Article 10.8
1
-
Article 10.9
8
-
Article 11
29
-
Article 11.1
49
-
Article 11.2
11
-
Article 11.3
22
-
Article 11.4
14
-
Article 18
1
-
Article 18.1
6
-
Article 2
25
-
Article 2.1
155
-
Article 2.1
9
-
Article 2.1(a)
267
-
Article 2.1(a)
20
-
Article 2.1(b)
4
-
Article 2.1(c)
3
-
Article 2.1(d)
24
-
Article 2.1(e)
33
-
Article 2.10
35
-
Article 2.2
5
-
Article 2.2(a)
2
-
Article 2.3
18
-
Article 2.4(b)
8
-
Article 2.5
62
-
Article 2.6
2
-
Article 2.7
1
-
Article 2.8
1
-
Article 2.9
20
-
Article 2.9(a)
1
-
Article 2(b)
1
-
Article 2(c)
2
-
Article 2(e)
5
-
Article 24
1
-
Article 3.2
1
-
Article 4
2
-
Article 5
2
-
Article 6
1
-
Article 6.2
1
-
Article 7
11
-
Article 7.1
13
-
Article 7.1(c)
10
-
Article 7.2
3
-
Article 7.3
8
-
Article 7.4
3
-
Article 7.5
9
-
Article 8
1
-
Article 8.1
5
-
Article 8.1(c)
8
-
Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
1
-
Article 8.2
11
-
Article 8.3
84
-
Article 9
13
-
Article 9.1
11
-
Article 9.1(a)
23
-
Article 9.1(b)
22
-
Article 9.2
34
-
Article 9.3
4
-
Article 9.4
4
-
Article 9.5
16
-
Article 9(b)
1
Showing 1 - 1 of 1