Outcome: The Tribunal found that the Secretary-General acted properly within his broad discretion in deciding to take no action in relation to the Applicant’s appeal against the non-renewal of his fixed-term appointment, and the appeal was dismissed.
Rule 104.12(b)(ii)
-
Appendix B
3
-
Chapter IV
1
-
Chapter IX
2
-
Chapter VII
1
-
Chapter X
4
-
Chapter XI
1
-
Rule 1.2(h)
2
-
Rule 10.2
3
-
Rule 10.2(a)(ix)
2
-
Rule 10.3(a)
3
-
Rule 10.4(c)
1
-
Rule 10.4b
1
-
Rule 101.1
1
-
Rule 101.2(2)
1
-
Rule 101.2(a)
1
-
Rule 101.2(b)
6
-
Rule 101.2(c)
2
-
Rule 101.2(d)
11
-
Rule 101.2(g)
3
-
Rule 101.2(h)
1
-
Rule 101.4(a)
1
-
Rule 103.13
1
-
Rule 103.20
1
-
Rule 103.21(a)
1
-
Rule 103.24
1
-
Rule 103.24(a)
1
-
Rule 103.7(d)(ii)
1
-
Rule 103.9
2
-
Rule 103.9(a)
1
-
Rule 104.1
1
-
Rule 104.10
1
-
Rule 104.10(a)
4
-
Rule 104.12
5
-
Rule 104.12(a)
1
-
Rule 104.12(b)
17
-
Rule 104.12(b)(i)
2
-
Rule 104.12(b)(ii)
13
-
Rule 104.12(b)(iii)
2
-
Rule 104.13
3
-
Rule 104.13(a)
1
-
Rule 104.13(c)
6
-
Rule 104.14
4
-
Rule 104.14(a)(i)
6
-
Rule 104.14(h)(i)
1
-
Rule 104.15
1
-
Rule 104.15(b)(i)
1
-
Rule 104.3
5
-
Rule 104.4
3
-
Rule 104.4(e)
1
-
Rule 104.6
3
-
Rule 104.6(b)
1
-
Rule 104.7
2
-
Rule 104.7(a)
1
-
Rule 104.8
2
-
Rule 105
1
-
Rule 105.1(b)
2
-
Rule 105.1(b)(iii)
1
-
Rule 105.1(c)
1
-
Rule 105.2
3
-
Rule 105.2(a)
1
-
Rule 105.2(a)(i)
3
-
Rule 105.2(a)(ii)
1
-
Rule 105.2(a)(iii)b
1
-
Rule 105.3
2
-
Rule 105.3(d)
1
-
Rule 105.3(d)(iii)
1
-
Rule 106.2
2
-
Rule 106.2(a)
1
-
Rule 106.2(c)
2
-
Rule 106.2(g)
1
-
Rule 106.6
2
-
Rule 107
1
-
Rule 107.1
1
-
Rule 107.21
1
-
Rule 107.21(h)
1
-
Rule 107.27
1
-
Rule 107.28
1
-
Rule 107.28(c)
1
-
Rule 107.4(b)
1
-
Rule 107.6
1
-
Rule 108.1
1
-
Rule 108.2
1
-
Rule 109.1
1
-
Rule 109.1(b)
2
-
Rule 109.1(c)
4
-
Rule 109.1(c)(i)
1
-
Rule 109.1(c)(ii)(a)
1
-
Rule 109.15
1
-
Rule 109.3
1
-
Rule 109.5(h)
1
-
Rule 109.7
7
-
Rule 109.7(a)
5
-
Rule 109.8
2
-
Rule 11.2
3
-
Rule 11.2(c)
3
-
Rule 110.1
8
-
Rule 110.2
4
-
Rule 110.2(a)
3
-
Rule 110.3
8
-
Rule 110.3(a)
2
-
Rule 110.3(a)(i)
2
-
Rule 110.3(a)(iv)
1
-
Rule 110.3(a)(viii)
1
-
Rule 110.3(b)
2
-
Rule 110.3(b)(i)
1
-
Rule 110.3(vii)
1
-
Rule 110.4
8
-
Rule 110.4(a)
1
-
Rule 110.4(c)
3
-
Rule 110.7
1
-
Rule 110.7(b)
1
-
Rule 111
1
-
Rule 111.1
3
-
Rule 111.2
11
-
Rule 111.2(a)
61
-
Rule 111.2(a)(f)
1
-
Rule 111.2(a)(i)
3
-
Rule 111.2(a)(i)(ii)
1
-
Rule 111.2(a)(ii)
1
-
Rule 111.2(c)
1
-
Rule 111.2(c)(iii)
1
-
Rule 111.2(e)
1
-
Rule 111.2(f)
24
-
Rule 111.2(p)
1
-
Rule 111.2(q)
1
-
Rule 111.4(b)
1
-
Rule 112.2
1
-
Rule 112.2(a)
1
-
Rule 112.2(b)
6
-
Rule 112.2(f)
1
-
Rule 112.3
2
-
Rule 112.7
1
-
Rule 200.2(b)
1
-
Rule 204.3
5
-
Rule 204.3(d)
1
-
Rule 205.3(a)(iii)
1
-
Rule 208.5(a)
1
-
Rule 209.2(a)
1
-
Rule 209.2(c)
1
-
Rule 209.5
1
-
Rule 3
1
-
Rule 3.13(a)(iii)
1
-
Rule 3.17(c)(ii)
1
-
Rule 301.1
3
-
Rule 301.3
1
-
Rule 301.3(d)
1
-
Rule 301.3(q)(ii)
1
-
Rule 301.4
2
-
Rule 304.1
2
-
Rule 304.3
1
-
Rule 304.4
2
-
Rule 304.4(a)
4
-
Rule 304.4(b)
1
-
Rule 304(a)
1
-
Rule 309.2
3
-
Rule 309.3
2
-
Rule 309.4
2
-
Rule 309.5(a)
3
-
Rule 309.5(b)
1
-
Rule 310.1
2
-
Rule 310.1(e)(ii)
1
-
Rule 310.1(e)(iv)
1
-
Rule 311.1
1
-
Rule 312.6
1
-
Rule 4.17
2
-
Rule 4.4(b)
1
-
Rule 5.3
1
Showing 11 - 13 of 13
Reasons for non-renewal: While the Administration is not bound to provide a staff member with the reasons for the non-renewal of his or her appointment, when the staff member contests before the Tribunal the legality of the non-renewal decision, holding that the motives behind were unlawful, the Administration must communicate to the Tribunal such motives and show they were real.
Disciplinary matters / misconduct
Discrimination and other improper motives
Non-renewal
Reassignment or transfer
Legitimate expectation: The Tribunal held that while a legitimate expectation can be created by an express promise on the part of the Organization, given the special nature of fixed-term contracts within the Organization an expectation of contract renewal may also be based on the surrounding circumstances, including the practices of the Organization. In view of the foregoing, the Tribunal concluded that since there was a practice of renewing the Applicant’s fixed-term appointment, he was entitled to expect its continued renewal unless there was a legitimate reason for not renewing the...