The Tribunal found that the Applicant’s appointment of limited duration carried no expectancy of renewal and that there were no countervailing circumstances which could have created such expectancy. It also found that the reason for non-renewal, namely the negative impact that allegations then made against the Applicant in the local media could have on the Organization, was supported by the facts and that the non-renewal decision therefore constituted a proper exercise of the Secretary-General’s discretion. Scope of discretion of the Secretary-General in non-renewal cases: It is within the...
Rule 309.5(a)
-
Appendix B
3
-
Chapter IV
1
-
Chapter IX
2
-
Chapter VII
1
-
Chapter X
4
-
Chapter XI
1
-
Rule 1.2(h)
2
-
Rule 10.2
3
-
Rule 10.2(a)(ix)
2
-
Rule 10.3(a)
3
-
Rule 10.4(c)
1
-
Rule 10.4b
1
-
Rule 101.1
1
-
Rule 101.2(2)
1
-
Rule 101.2(a)
1
-
Rule 101.2(b)
6
-
Rule 101.2(c)
2
-
Rule 101.2(d)
11
-
Rule 101.2(g)
3
-
Rule 101.2(h)
1
-
Rule 101.4(a)
1
-
Rule 103.13
1
-
Rule 103.20
1
-
Rule 103.21(a)
1
-
Rule 103.24
1
-
Rule 103.24(a)
1
-
Rule 103.7(d)(ii)
1
-
Rule 103.9
2
-
Rule 103.9(a)
1
-
Rule 104.1
1
-
Rule 104.10
1
-
Rule 104.10(a)
4
-
Rule 104.12
5
-
Rule 104.12(a)
1
-
Rule 104.12(b)
17
-
Rule 104.12(b)(i)
2
-
Rule 104.12(b)(ii)
13
-
Rule 104.12(b)(iii)
2
-
Rule 104.13
3
-
Rule 104.13(a)
1
-
Rule 104.13(c)
6
-
Rule 104.14
4
-
Rule 104.14(a)(i)
6
-
Rule 104.14(h)(i)
1
-
Rule 104.15
1
-
Rule 104.15(b)(i)
1
-
Rule 104.3
5
-
Rule 104.4
3
-
Rule 104.4(e)
1
-
Rule 104.6
3
-
Rule 104.6(b)
1
-
Rule 104.7
2
-
Rule 104.7(a)
1
-
Rule 104.8
2
-
Rule 105
1
-
Rule 105.1(b)
2
-
Rule 105.1(b)(iii)
1
-
Rule 105.1(c)
1
-
Rule 105.2
3
-
Rule 105.2(a)
1
-
Rule 105.2(a)(i)
3
-
Rule 105.2(a)(ii)
1
-
Rule 105.2(a)(iii)b
1
-
Rule 105.3
2
-
Rule 105.3(d)
1
-
Rule 105.3(d)(iii)
1
-
Rule 106.2
2
-
Rule 106.2(a)
1
-
Rule 106.2(c)
2
-
Rule 106.2(g)
1
-
Rule 106.6
2
-
Rule 107
1
-
Rule 107.1
1
-
Rule 107.21
1
-
Rule 107.21(h)
1
-
Rule 107.27
1
-
Rule 107.28
1
-
Rule 107.28(c)
1
-
Rule 107.4(b)
1
-
Rule 107.6
1
-
Rule 108.1
1
-
Rule 108.2
1
-
Rule 109.1
1
-
Rule 109.1(b)
2
-
Rule 109.1(c)
4
-
Rule 109.1(c)(i)
1
-
Rule 109.1(c)(ii)(a)
1
-
Rule 109.15
1
-
Rule 109.3
1
-
Rule 109.5(h)
1
-
Rule 109.7
7
-
Rule 109.7(a)
5
-
Rule 109.8
2
-
Rule 11.2
3
-
Rule 11.2(c)
3
-
Rule 110.1
8
-
Rule 110.2
4
-
Rule 110.2(a)
3
-
Rule 110.3
8
-
Rule 110.3(a)
2
-
Rule 110.3(a)(i)
2
-
Rule 110.3(a)(iv)
1
-
Rule 110.3(a)(viii)
1
-
Rule 110.3(b)
2
-
Rule 110.3(b)(i)
1
-
Rule 110.3(vii)
1
-
Rule 110.4
8
-
Rule 110.4(a)
1
-
Rule 110.4(c)
3
-
Rule 110.7
1
-
Rule 110.7(b)
1
-
Rule 111
1
-
Rule 111.1
3
-
Rule 111.2
11
-
Rule 111.2(a)
61
-
Rule 111.2(a)(f)
1
-
Rule 111.2(a)(i)
3
-
Rule 111.2(a)(i)(ii)
1
-
Rule 111.2(a)(ii)
1
-
Rule 111.2(c)
1
-
Rule 111.2(c)(iii)
1
-
Rule 111.2(e)
1
-
Rule 111.2(f)
24
-
Rule 111.2(p)
1
-
Rule 111.2(q)
1
-
Rule 111.4(b)
1
-
Rule 112.2
1
-
Rule 112.2(a)
1
-
Rule 112.2(b)
6
-
Rule 112.2(f)
1
-
Rule 112.3
2
-
Rule 112.7
1
-
Rule 200.2(b)
1
-
Rule 204.3
5
-
Rule 204.3(d)
1
-
Rule 205.3(a)(iii)
1
-
Rule 208.5(a)
1
-
Rule 209.2(a)
1
-
Rule 209.2(c)
1
-
Rule 209.5
1
-
Rule 3
1
-
Rule 3.13(a)(iii)
1
-
Rule 3.17(c)(ii)
1
-
Rule 301.1
3
-
Rule 301.3
1
-
Rule 301.3(d)
1
-
Rule 301.3(q)(ii)
1
-
Rule 301.4
2
-
Rule 304.1
2
-
Rule 304.3
1
-
Rule 304.4
2
-
Rule 304.4(a)
4
-
Rule 304.4(b)
1
-
Rule 304(a)
1
-
Rule 309.2
3
-
Rule 309.3
2
-
Rule 309.4
2
-
Rule 309.5(a)
3
-
Rule 309.5(b)
1
-
Rule 310.1
2
-
Rule 310.1(e)(ii)
1
-
Rule 310.1(e)(iv)
1
-
Rule 311.1
1
-
Rule 312.6
1
-
Rule 4.17
2
-
Rule 4.4(b)
1
-
Rule 5.3
1
Showing 1 - 3 of 3
Appointment (type)
Appointment of Limited Duration
Non-renewal
Performance management
Performance evaluation
While finding that there had been a procedural flaw in the FOPA evaluation, inasmuch as the Applicant had been denied a rebuttal, the Tribunal considered that there was not causal effect between this flaw and the non-renewal decision, noting that the contested decision refers only to the third and last appraisal, which was made in accordance with the applicable rules. Resolution 59/296 and reappointment of 300 series staff members under 100 series: The said resolution authorises the Secretary-General to reappoint staff members holding an appointment under the 300 series of former Staff Rules...
TEST -Rename- Benefits and entitlements-45
Disciplinary matters / misconduct
Due process
Separation from service
The purported termination conveyed in the letter from the ED of UNOPS dated 11 May 2010 is accordingly rescinded. The Tribunal finds that the Applicant had not misused his UNLP and Ãå±±½ûµØID when he showed it to the person with whom he had entered into a business transaction. Ultra Vires: The Secretary-General or his agents in the instant case blatantly acted outside the scope of his or their authority in carrying a disciplinary process beyond the expiry date of the staff member’s contract. The decision to separate the Applicant in May 2010 was manifestly ultra vires and therefore unlawful. Debt...