Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2012/179

UNDT/2012/179, Mobono

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The purported termination conveyed in the letter from the ED of UNOPS dated 11 May 2010 is accordingly rescinded. The Tribunal finds that the Applicant had not misused his UNLP and Ãå±±½ûµØID when he showed it to the person with whom he had entered into a business transaction. Ultra Vires: The Secretary-General or his agents in the instant case blatantly acted outside the scope of his or their authority in carrying a disciplinary process beyond the expiry date of the staff member’s contract. The decision to separate the Applicant in May 2010 was manifestly ultra vires and therefore unlawful. Debt: It is necessary to emphasize here that the Organization is not a debt collector and can only lawfully deduct monies owed to third parties in the enforcement of proper garnishee orders of properly constituted courts.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant was contesting the decision, dated 11 May 2010, to separate him from the Organisation without notice and without compensation in lieu of notice, which decision he had received on 12 May 2010. The said administrative decision to separate him came about as a result of a finding that certain alleged actions on his part amounted to serious misconduct.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part
Outcome Extra Text

UNDT rescinded the purported termination.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.