Ãå±±½ûµØ

Rule 111.1 (18)

  • Rule 102.2(13)
  • Rule 102.2(14)
  • Rule 110.1
  • Rule 110.1(11)
  • Rule 111.(7)
  • Rule 111.1 (18)
  • Rule 111.1.(8)
  • Rule 111.1(10)
  • Rule 111.1(2)
  • Rule 111.1(20)
  • Rule 111.1(3)
  • Rule 111.1(5)
  • Rule 111.1(6)
    • Showing 1 - 1 of 1

    2023-UNAT-1374, RoseMarie Heftberger

    Discrimination and other improper motives Bias/favouritism Due process Access to justice Jurisdiction / receivability (UNAT) Appeal Legal services (OSLA or other) and self-representation Legal representation Staff selection (non-selection/non-promotion) Full and fair consideration Selection decision Gender

    The UNAT held that the ICAO Appeals Board implemented internal changes in its law to satisfy the requirements of Article 2(10) of the Appeals Tribunal Statute.  It found that the Appeals Board no longer provided only advice or mere recommendations to the ICAO Secretary General, but rather final decisions and, therefore, was a neutral first instance process.  It further found that while it might have been open to ICAO to consider using the UNDT for resolution of staff member disputes, it was free not to do so and cannot be criticised for doing as it did.  It concluded that the Appeals Board’s...

    Full judgment
    Case digest