Ăĺ±±˝űµŘ

UNHCR/HCP/2014/2 (Policy and Procedures for the Promotion of International Professional Staff Members)

  • AC/UNITAR/2019/05
  • Administrative Rules of UNJSPF
  • DIOS Guide to conducting misconduct investigations
  • ICAO Field Service Staff Rules Part VIII
  • ICAO FSSR Annex VIII
  • ICAO Service Code
  • ICJ Former Staff Regulations, Regulation 11.5
  • ICJ Former Staff Regulations, Regulation 11.7
  • ICJ Statute
  • ICSC RoP
  • ICSC Statute
  • ICTR Code of Professional Conduct for Defence Counsel
  • ICTR Rules of Procedure and Evidence
  • ICTR Statute
  • ICTY Statute
  • ILO Equal Remuneration Convention
  • ILOAT Statute
  • IMO/FMO/65/2003/Section 5.2.8
  • Inter-Organization Agreement concerning Transfer, Secondment or Loan of Staff among the Organizations Applying the United Nations Common System of Salaries and Allowances (CEB/2003/HLCM/CM/7)
  • ISA ISBA/ST/AI/2017/3 (Performance Management and Appraisal System)
  • ITC/AI/2015/07
  • ITLOS Administrative Instructions
  • Jordan Field Staff Circular J/17/97
  • La politique de rapatriement du PNUD
  • OAI Guidelines
  • STL Statute
  • The UNDP Repatriation Policy
  • The UNHCR Policy on Special Leave Without Pay (SLWOP)
  • Ăĺ±±˝űµŘWOMEN Financial Regulation and Rules
  • UNDP Agreed Separations
  • UNDP Financial Regulations
  • UNDP Human Resources User Guide on Workplace Harassment and Abuse of Authority (May 2018)
  • UNDP ICT Policy
  • UNDP Legal Framework
  • UNDP OAI Charter
  • UNDP Policy on Family Relationships
  • UNDP Recruitment and Selection Framework
  • UNDP Rules and Procedures for the UNDP Compliance Review
  • UNFPA Charter of Office of Audit and Investigation Services
  • UNFPA Disciplinary Framework
  • UNFPA Financial Regulation 14.8(b)
  • UNFPA Policies and Procedures Manual Secretary
  • UNFPA Procurement Procedure A.4
  • UNFPA Procurement Procedure C.1
  • UNFPA Procurement Procedure C.4.2
  • UNFPA’s Policies and Procedures Manual
  • UNHCR Code of Conduct
  • UNHCR IOM No. 044/2013-FOM 044/2013
  • UNHCR IOM/09/FOM/10/2012
  • UNHCR Procedure on Assignments (UNHCR/HCP/2015/2/Rev.1)
  • UNHCR/AI/2018/18 (Administrative Instruction on Misconduct and the Disciplinary Process)
  • UNHCR/AI/2018/2
  • UNHCR/AI/2019/13 (Administrative Instruction on End User Computing)
  • UNHCR/AI/2020/1/Rev.2 (Administrative Instruction on Recruitment and Assignment of Locally Recruited Staff (“RALS”))
  • UNHCR/AI/2020/1/Rev.2 (Instruction administrative sur le recrutement et l'affectation du personnel recrutĂ© localement (« RALS »))
  • UNHCR/AI/2022/09
  • UNHCR/HCP/2014/12 (UNHCR Policy on Performance Management)
  • UNHCR/HCP/2014/12/Rev. 1, Revised Policy on Performance Management
  • UNHCR/HCP/2014/2 (Policy and Procedures for the Promotion of International Professional Staff Members)
  • UNHCR/HCP/2014/3 (Policy on Resolving Situations of Staff Members in Between Assignments)
  • UNHCR/HCP/2014/4
  • UNHCR/HCP/2014/4 Policy on Discrimination
  • UNHCR/HCP/2015/9, Policy on the Administration of Fixed-Term Appointments
  • UNHCR/HCP/2017/2 (Recruitment and Assigments Policy “RAP”)
  • UNHCR/HCP/2022/07 (Recruitment and Assignments Policy)
  • UNICEF DHR/PROCEDURE/2017/001 (UNICEF Procedure on dependency allowances)
  • UNICEF DHR/PROCEDURE/2017/005
  • UNICEFDHR/Procedure/2017/006
  • UNICRI Statute
  • UNJSPF Rules and Pension Adjustment System of the Fund (JSPB/G.4/Rev.19 of 1 January 2014)
  • UNOPS Executive Office Directive Ref. EOD.ED.2019.02
  • UNOPS Operational Directive OD.PCG.2017.01
  • UNOPS Organizational Directive No. 10 (Policy to address fraud)
  • UNRWA Agency Policy in respect of Staff who are arrested
  • UNRWA DIOS Guide to Conducting Investigations, 2021
  • UNRWA DIOS Technical Instruction on Investigation Policy 01/2021
  • UNRWA General Staff Circular GSC 5/2007
  • UNRWA General Staff Circular No.01/2013
  • UNRWA GSC No.06/2010
  • UNRWA ISC No.1/4/97
  • UNRWA Organization Directive No. 20
  • UNRWA Organization Directive No.1 of 15 July 1987
  • UNU Charter
  • World Health Organization’s Policy and Procedures Concerning Harassment, Sexual Harassment, Discrimination, and Abuse of Authority
  • Showing 1 - 6 of 6

    UNDT held that the separation of female and male candidates for their comparative assessment and ranking at the Second Round constituted a fundamental error in the implementation of the Promotions Policy, and could not be justified by the High Commissioner’s decision to award an equal number of promotions to female and male staff members which was, in any event, announced towards the end of said Round. UNDT held that the exclusion of the e-PADs from the Panel members’ comparative assessment of the candidates during the Second Round constituted another fundamental procedural error in the...

    The UNDT found that the contested decision was unlawful on the grounds that 1) the Organization committed several procedural errors in the implementation of the UNHCR Policy and Procedures for the Promotion of International Professional Staff Members (UNHCR/HCP/2014/2) (“Promotions Policy”), some of which resulted in a failure to take into account relevant information or to take into account irrelevant considerations; and 2) the Organization failed to minimally show that the Applicant’s candidacy for promotion received fair and full consideration. Standard of review: In the context of a...

    Standard of review: In the context of a promotion exercise conducted under a specific policy, the Tribunal’s review is essentially focused on the implementation of the policy. It is not the Tribunal’s role to examine whether a policy adopted by the Organization is well-founded or appropriate. However, a decision may be rescinded if it is taken pursuant to a policy which does not comply with a higher norm and the irregularity results in a staff member not being given full and fair consideration for promotion. The Tribunal cannot amend a policy adopted by the Organization but may “point out what...

    Standard of review: In the context of a promotion exercise conducted under a specific policy, the Tribunal’s review is essentially focused on the implementation of the policy. It is not the Tribunal’s role to examine whether a policy adopted by the Organization is well-founded or appropriate. However, a decision may be rescinded if it is taken pursuant to a policy which does not comply with a higher norm and the irregularity results in a staff member not being given full and fair consideration for promotion. The Tribunal cannot amend a policy adopted by the Organization but may “point out what...

    Standard of review: In the context of a promotion exercise conducted under a specific policy, the Tribunal’s review is essentially focused on the implementation of the policy. It is not the Tribunal’s role to examine whether a policy adopted by the Organization is well-founded or appropriate. However, a decision may be rescinded if it is taken pursuant to a policy which does not comply with a higher norm and the irregularity results in a staff member not being given full and fair consideration for promotion. The Tribunal cannot amend a policy adopted by the Organization but may “point out what...

    Standard of review: In the context of a promotion exercise conducted under a specific policy, the Tribunal’s review is essentially focused on the implementation of the policy. It is not the Tribunal’s role to examine whether a policy adopted by the Organization is well-founded or appropriate. However, a decision may be rescinded if it is taken pursuant to a policy which does not comply with a higher norm and the irregularity results in a staff member not being given full and fair consideration for promotion. The Tribunal cannot amend a policy adopted by the Organization but may “point out what...