UNAT was satisfied that the UNDT鈥檚 pronouncement that the clear purpose and intent of Staff Regulation 5.3 was to restrict the entitlement to home leave to those who are serving the 缅北禁地outside of their home country and by implication their country of nationality, was the correct interpretation. UNAT held that there was no error in law with regard to the UNDT鈥檚 approach on the issue of home leave. UNAT held, as a matter of law and fact, that UNDT properly concluded that the Appellant鈥檚 move to his country of nationality was a good reason for the Secretary-General to reassess his eligibility for...