2011-UNAT-140 | SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

2011-UNAT-140, Wang

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT was satisfied that the UNDT’s pronouncement that the clear purpose and intent of Staff Regulation 5.3 was to restrict the entitlement to home leave to those who are serving the �山��outside of their home country and by implication their country of nationality, was the correct interpretation. UNAT held that there was no error in law with regard to the UNDT’s approach on the issue of home leave. UNAT held, as a matter of law and fact, that UNDT properly concluded that the Appellant’s move to his country of nationality was a good reason for the Secretary-General to reassess his eligibility for a country of home leave other than the country of nationality. UNAT held that, in light of the Appellant having returned to work and residing in the country of his nationality, he ceased to be eligible for the payment of an education grant. UNAT upheld the UNDT’s finding that the Secretary-General was entitled to refuse the Appellant’s application for an education grant. UNAT held that, while it gave due recognition to the fact that the Administration’s errors impacted adversely on the Appellant, UNDT, in assessing the level of compensation, erred in failing to attach sufficient weight to the reliance placed by the Appellant on the assurances given to him and the reasonable expectations he held, following such assurances. UNAT held that UNDT erred in its conclusion that the payment made by the Administration constituted sufficient satisfaction. UNAT allowed the appeal in part and awarded the increased compensation to two years of the education grant which would have been available to the Appellant for the school years 2006/2007 and 2007/2008.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision that he was ineligible for either home leave or an education grant. UNDT found against the Applicant and considered that the Secretary-General’s exceptional authorisation of an education grant for two years constituted a sufficient remedy for any errors made by the Organisation.

Legal Principle(s)

Where the administration commits an irregularity, it falls to it to take such measure as are appropriate to correct the staff member’s situation. Where a staff member has acted in good faith, he or she is entitled to compensation for the damage suffered as a result.

Outcome

Appeal granted in part

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Wang

Entity

ESCAP

Case Number(s)

2010-133

Tribunal

UNAT

Registry Location :

New York