UNAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General limited to the discrete issue of the 鈥淥bservations鈥 of UNDT. UNAT held that the Secretary-General, despite being the beneficiary of a UNDT judgment in his favour, was entitled to appeal the observations. UNAT held that UNDT overstepped the mark to a significant degree in effectively recording, as part of its judgment, 鈥淥bservations鈥 in the manner in which it did. UNAT held that, in light of the UNDT鈥檚 determination on the issue of receivability, UNDT had no jurisdiction to make 鈥淥bservations鈥 as it did. UNAT allowed the appeal and ordered that...