2013-UNAT-361

2013-UNAT-361, Ngoma-Mabiala

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General limited to the discrete issue of the “Observations” of UNDT. UNAT held that the Secretary-General, despite being the beneficiary of a UNDT judgment in his favour, was entitled to appeal the observations. UNAT held that UNDT overstepped the mark to a significant degree in effectively recording, as part of its judgment, “Observations” in the manner in which it did. UNAT held that, in light of the UNDT’s determination on the issue of receivability, UNDT had no jurisdiction to make “Observations” as it did. UNAT allowed the appeal and ordered that the title “Observations” and paragraphs 25 to 36 be redacted from the UNDT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Mr Ngoma-Mabiala contested the mode of recovery of an overpayment without formal notification or an amended contract after his post was mistakenly reclassified by the Organisation. UNDT dismissed the application as not receivable for failure to request management evaluation, but, under “Observations”, UNDT concluded that the Administration had made certain mistakes that deprived Mr Ngoma-Mabiala of his rights.

Legal Principle(s)

UNDT may err in law and go beyond its jurisdiction if it effectively embarks on a consideration of the merits of a case after it has limited the matter to adjudication of the receivability issues only.

Outcome

Appeal granted

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Ngoma-Mabiala

Entity

MONUC

Case Number(s)

2012-405

Tribunal

UNAT

Registry Location :

New York