Ãå±±½ûµØ

2010-UNAT-039

2010-UNAT-039, Maghari

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered whether the Commissioner-General erred in adopting the JAB’s recommendation not to accept the Appellant’s withdrawal letter and whether the Appellant was entitled to compensation for moral and material damages. UNAT referred to Jordan Field Staff Circular No. J/17/97, which provides that withdrawal of resignations will normally not be accepted unless it is evident that such withdrawal is in the sole interest of the work. UNAT noted that the evidence on record revealed that the Appellant’s services were unsatisfactory. UNAT held that the Appellant provided no evidence of prejudice, improper motivation, procedural irregularity, or error of law in the taking of the decision not to accept his request for the withdrawal of his resignation. UNAT accordingly rejected the Appellant’s claim for damages. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Commissioner-General’s decision.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

UNRWA decision: The Applicant contested the decision to reject the withdrawal of his request for voluntary retirement. The UNRWA JAB concluded that the appeal was not receivable ratione materiae. The UNRWA Commissioner-General adopted the UNRWA JAB recommendation and dismissed the appeal.

Legal Principle(s)

Withdrawal of resignations will normally not be accepted, unless it is evident, that such withdrawal is in the sole interest of the work. A withdrawal of resignation requires the Director of UNRWA Operations’ prior approval.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits
Outcome Extra Text

No relief ordered; No relief ordered

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Maghari
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type