2010-UNAT-039, Maghari
UNAT considered whether the Commissioner-General erred in adopting the JAB’s recommendation not to accept the Appellant’s withdrawal letter and whether the Appellant was entitled to compensation for moral and material damages. UNAT referred to Jordan Field Staff Circular No. J/17/97, which provides that withdrawal of resignations will normally not be accepted unless it is evident that such withdrawal is in the sole interest of the work. UNAT noted that the evidence on record revealed that the Appellant’s services were unsatisfactory. UNAT held that the Appellant provided no evidence of prejudice, improper motivation, procedural irregularity, or error of law in the taking of the decision not to accept his request for the withdrawal of his resignation. UNAT accordingly rejected the Appellant’s claim for damages. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Commissioner-General’s decision.
UNRWA decision: The Applicant contested the decision to reject the withdrawal of his request for voluntary retirement. The UNRWA JAB concluded that the appeal was not receivable ratione materiae. The UNRWA Commissioner-General adopted the UNRWA JAB recommendation and dismissed the appeal.
Withdrawal of resignations will normally not be accepted, unless it is evident, that such withdrawal is in the sole interest of the work. A withdrawal of resignation requires the Director of UNRWA Operations’ prior approval.
No relief ordered; No relief ordered