2011-UNAT-104, Sanwidi
UNAT considered an appeal of judgment No. UNDT/2010/061 on compensation. UNAT held that, as it had previously overturned the judgment on the merits (which found in favour of Mr Sanwidi), the foundation for an award of compensation no longer existed and the appeal was moot. UNAT held that the judgment on compensation was automatically vacated when it overturned the judgment on the merits. UNAT dismissed the appeal and vacated the UNDT judgment.
The Applicant contested the decision to summarily dismiss him for serious misconduct. UNDT issued judgment No. UNDT/2010/036 on the merits and judgment No. UNDT/2010/061 on compensation. Subsequently, in judgment No. 2010-UNAT-084, UNAT set aside judgment No. UNDT/2010/036.
A judgment on compensation is automatically vacated if the corresponding judgment on the merits, which is the foundation for the award of compensation, is overturned.