2011-UNAT-132 | SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

2011-UNAT-132, Frechon

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. UNAT held that it was satisfied that the UNDT’s conclusion that Ms Frechon was incapable of further service, based on the findings of the Medical Board, was not tantamount to UNDT having stepped into the shoes of the �山��Medical Director. UNAT held that there were no grounds to disagree with the finding of UNDT that Ms Frechon’s contract was, in fact, terminated for medical reasons. UNAT held that the procedure which should have been invoked was that set out in ST/AI/1999/16. UNAT held that UNDT was correct in rescinding the decision to terminate Ms Frechon’s employment. UNAT upheld the Order reinstating Ms Frechon but changed it to an Order to reinstate Ms Frechon for the purpose of the Administration initiating the procedures pursuant to ST/AI/1999/16. UNAT adjusted the way in which interest on the compensation awarded should be calculated. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNDT judgment with the above-noted variances to the Orders contained therein.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Ms Frechon contested the decision not to renew her fixed-term appointment. UNDT found for Ms Frechon, reinstating her and awarding her compensation.

Legal Principle(s)

A fixed-term appointment has no expectancy of renewal. An exception to the rules governing the expiry of a fixed-term contract will arise if the administrative decision not to renew is based on improper motives or if there are countervailing circumstances.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Frechon

Entity

ICTR

Case Number(s)

2010-125

Tribunal

UNAT

Registry Location :

New York