Ãå±±½ûµØ

2012-UNAT-276, Valimaki-Erk

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. UNAT held that although the Secretary-General has discretion in the appointment of staff, he has no discretion to impose unwritten regulations and rules that are prejudicial to staff members. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNDT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision that she must either apply for the Australian citizenship or renounce her Australian permanent resident status as a condition for a two-year appointment for the post of Procurement Officer. UNDT concluded that such requirement lacked a legal basis since there was no regulation in the Staff Regulations and Rules nor provision in any of the General Assembly resolutions that required staff members to renounce their permanent resident status in a country that is not their country of nationality before he or she could enter service with the Organisation at the professional or higher level.

Legal Principle(s)

The Organisation’s policy to require an individual to renounce permanent residency in a country outside his or her country of nationality before he or she could take up an appointment with the Organisation has no legal basis and is unlawful.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Valimaki-Erk
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Document Topic/Theme :