Ãå±±½ûµØ

2013-UNAT-308

2013-UNAT-308, Romman

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT held that, absent a request for waiver or extension of the time limits as well as any factors that would qualify as exceptional circumstances, the appeal was time-barred. UNAT dismissed the appeal as not receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

UNRWA DT judgment: The Applicant, a Headteacher, contested the decisions to censure him, suspend him from duty without pay for three days and demote him to the post of Teacher. These measures were imposed for misconduct in the form of asking a student to absent himself, asking a teacher to mark the student as present, and promising the student a pass certificate, in addition to beating students.

Legal Principle(s)

UNAT strictly enforces statutory time limits.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on receivability
Outcome Extra Text

No relief ordered; No relief ordered.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Romman
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type