Ãå±±½ûµØ

2013-UNAT-330, Nwuke

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered two appeals, one against Order No. 103 (NBI/2012) and one against judgment No. UNDT/2012/116. UNAT held that the Appellant had not established any excess of jurisdiction or competence on the part of UNDT; rather, his claims addressed the merits of the UNDT decision. UNAT noted that even if the UNDT had erred in law or fact and as also alleged in the case, committed an error of procedure, this did not instance any excess of jurisdiction or competence on its part such as would entitle the Appellant to bypass the exception to the right to appeal set out in Article 2(2) of the UNDT Statute. UNAT held that the appeals were not receivable. UNAT dismissed the appeals.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

UNDT order and judgment: In the context of a dispute over the appointment of another individual to a post for which he had applied, the Applicant submitted a request for a suspension of action. In Order No. 103 (NBI/2012), UNDT rejected the request. In judgment No. UNDT/2012/116, UNDT set out the reasons as to why the request for suspension of action had not been granted.

Legal Principle(s)

Appeals from the UNDT on suspension of action decisions will be receivable only if UNDT, in adjudicating on such applications, exceeded its competence or jurisdiction.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Nwuke
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Applicable Law