2013-UNAT-333 | SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

2013-UNAT-333, Gehr

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The staff member appealed seven UNDT judgments. UNAT found that, by continuously filing appeals lacking merit, the staff member had manifestly abused the proceedings, and awarded costs against the staff member for the first time since its inception.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Legal Principle(s)

Where UNAT determines that a party has manifestly abused the appeals process, it may award costs against that party.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Gehr

Entity

UNODC

Case Number(s)

2012-363

Tribunal

UNAT

Registry Location :

New York