Ãå±±½ûµØ

2015-UNAT-508, Nwuke

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered both an appeal by the Secretary-General and also a cross-appeal by Mr Nwuke requesting additional compensation. UNAT held that UNDT erred in law in deciding that the appointment of the rostered candidate was unlawful and in breach of Mr Nwuke’s rights. UNAT held that no illegality occurred and that the appointment was entirely within the Administration’s discretion, which was not abusive. UNAT allowed the Secretary-General’s appeal, vacated the UNDT judgment and dismissed Mr Nwuke’s cross-appeal.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to fill a position for which he had applied with a candidate from the roster. UNDT found for the Applicant, awarding compensation.

Legal Principle(s)

There is no requirement for the head of department/office to first review all non-rostered candidates before selecting a candidate.

Outcome
Appeal granted

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Nwuke
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type