Ãå±±½ûµØ

2015-UNAT-522

2015-UNAT-522, Munir

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. UNAT held that there was no reason to reverse the finding of UNDT that a legitimate expectation of a one-year extension was unequivocally created by virtue of the decision taken at the Core Management Group meeting. UNAT affirmed the UNDT decision that Mr Munir had a legitimate expectation and the decision of the Resident Representative not to seek a one-year renewal of his contract was an unlawful exercise of discretion. UNAT held that the Secretary-General failed to demonstrate that the compensation was unreasonable because there was a basis for the award of compensation of nine months’ net base pay for the separation from service. UNAT held that UNDT erred in law and exceeded its jurisdiction in reviewing the additional complaints concerning the conduct of the Resident Representative, matters which had not been part of the Mr. Munir’s request for management evaluation, and making findings reaching the merits in connection with these matters. UNAT held that UNDT erred in awarding moral damages. UNAT held that the appeal succeeded in part. UNAT affirmed the UNDT judgment insofar as it related to the issue of non-renewal of Mr Munir’s appointment and the award of nine months’ net base pay; set aside part of the UNDT judgment in respect of the placement of Mr Munir on administrative leave and the ensuing investigation, as well as the award in the sum of USD 16,000 as compensation for moral damages.

Accountability referral: UNAT held that UNDT erred in referring the conduct of the Resident Representative to the UNDP Administrator. UNAT set aside the UNDT referral for possible action to enforce accountability.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Mr Munir contested the decision of the Resident Representative not to request an additional one-year extension of his appointment. UNDT found for Mr. Munir, awarded him compensation, and referred the Resident Representative to the Administrator of UNDP for possible action.

Legal Principle(s)

In order for a staff member’s claim of legitimate expectation of a renewal of appointment to be sustained, it must not be based on mere verbal assertion, but on a firm commitment to renewal revealed by the circumstances of the case. Management evaluation is a mandatory first step in the appeal process.

Outcome
Appeal granted in part

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Munir
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type