2015-UNAT-575

2015-UNAT-575, Gomez

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT held that the staff member’s retirement benefit from the UNJSPF including the monthly periodic pension benefit was not subject to taxation and/or payment of statutory deductions and that therefore, any challenge with respect to the application and meaning of the words “gross” and “net” was merely semantic. UNAT held that the ASHI premium was a voluntary payment that was deducted by the UNJSPF at the behest of a beneficiary and therefore could not be treated as or deemed to be a statutory deduction. UNAT dismissed the appeal.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The staff member and his former spouse signed a divorce notary deed in Austria, in which it was agreed that he would pay to his former spouse 50 per cent of his net base pension once retired from active service. He subsequently appealed a decision of the Standing Committee of the UNJSPB to deny his request under Article 45 of the UNJSPF Regulations that his former spouse be paid 50 per cent of his monthly periodic pension benefit after the deduction of his after-service health insurance (ASHI) premium. The staff member asserted that the Standing Committee erred in law in its interpretation of the phrase “net base pension”, thereby derogating from the ordinary definition of that phrase.

Legal Principle(s)

A net base pension benefit is the sum that is left after compulsory/statutory deductions. Where a staff member’s pension benefit from the UNJSPF is not subject to taxation and/or payment of statutory deductions, there is no “net base” to be considered.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Gomez
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type