2016-UNAT-634, Jaber et al.
UNAT held that the Appellants had failed to present any evidence showing that they had suffered mental distress during the investigation, and such evidence was necessary for an award of moral damages. UNAT held that there was no merit in the Appellant’s claim that UNRWA DT had erred in not awarding them compensation for the lengthy administrative delay during the investigation. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNRWA DT judgment.
The Applicants contested the decisions to suspend all of them from duty with pay for nearly 18 months without any compensation following the closure of the investigation into suspected fraud. UNRWA DT found that the duration of the investigation was not unreasonable given the complex financial issues and voluminous documents involved. UNRWA DT found that the 18-month delay in closing the investigation was not due to the Agency’s negligence and that it did not violate the Applicant’s due process rights. UNRWA DT rejected the requests for compensation, for the Agency to issue an apology and for the Tribunal to issue a declaration of their innocence. UNRWA DT dismissed all the applications.
Left deliberately blank