2016-UNAT-637 | SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

2016-UNAT-637, Maslei

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered the appeal by the Secretary-General challenging the amount of the award of compensation for moral damages. UNAT held that the award of moral damages was supported by the evidence before UNDT and that the amount was not excessive based on that evidence. UNAT rejected the Secretary-General’s argument that the award in the present case should be compared with awards in similar non-renewal cases. UNAT held that UNDT had not committed any error in its assessment of the award of moral damages and that the Secretary-General had not established any ground which would justify UNAT’s interference. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNDT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to renew her contract beyond December 31, 2013, on the grounds of unsatisfactory service, although her Standard Assignment Length (SAL) had been extended until December 31, 2014. UNDT found that the decision not to renew the Applicant’s appointment based on performance-related reasons was unlawful because the Administration had not followed the UNHCR’s policies on performance management. UNDT held that the extension of the SAL had given the Applicant a legitimate expectation that her one-year fixed-term appointment would be renewed until 31 December 2014. UNDT ordered the rescission of the non-renewal decision and, as an alternative to the rescission, the payment of compensation in lieu. UNDT additionally awarded the Applicant six months’ net base salary compensation for moral damage for the medical harm caused to her as a result of the decision not to renew her contract.

Legal Principle(s)

The criterion for an award of moral damages is the degree of injury suffered by the individual staff member as a result of the unlawful decision. That the type of unlawful decision is the same as in several other cases does not establish that the degree of moral damage must be similar in each case. The assessment of an award of moral damages is made on a case-by-case basis according to the discretion of the Tribunal.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Maslei

Entity

UNHCR

Case Number(s)

2015-846

Tribunal

UNAT

Registry Location :

New York