Ãå±±½ûµØ

2019-UNAT-963

2019-UNAT-963, Awe

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Applicant filed a second application for interpretation of judgment No. 2017-UNAT-774 and an application for execution of judgment No. 2018-UNAT-827. Subsequently, the Applicant requested leave to withdraw these two applications. UNAT granted leave to withdraw the applications and directed the Registrar to close the cases.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Previous UNAT judgments: In judgment No. 2017-UNAT-774, UNAT held that UNDT did not err in ordering the removal of adverse references to the staff member in meeting minutes and the recirculation of the revised minutes to all recipients to inform them of the findings of the relevant fact-finding panel that there was no basis to support the damaging comments made against the Appellant, UNAT reduced the amount of compensation and vacated the UNDT’s award for procedural error. In judgment No. 2018-UNAT-827, UNAT disposed of an application for interpretation of judgment No. 2017-UNAT-774.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome
Closed on withdrawal

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Awe
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type