2019-UNAT-972

2019-UNAT-972, Al Othman

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT held that UNRWA DT committed errors of law and fact resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision. UNAT held that UNRWA DT erred in its assessment of the alleged victim’s credibility. UNAT held that, contrary to UNRWA DT’s understanding, there was no record that the alleged victim had stated that she had been sexually attacked by the Appellant on previous occasions. UNAT held that UNRWA DT erred in drawing a negative inference about the credibility of the alleged victim from her delayed reporting. UNAT held that UNRWA erred in its assessment of the Appellant’s credibility, in particular, by failing to find that his behaviour after the reporting of the incident undermined his credibility in any way. UNAT held that it was unable to decide the case itself based on the documentary evidence. UNAT remanded the case to a different judge of UNRWA DT for new consideration on the merits.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested his summary dismissal on the grounds of serious misconduct. UNRWA DT concluded that the facts upon which the Applicant was disciplined were not established by clear and convincing evidence. UNRWA DT rescinded the decision to summarily dismiss the Applicant and ordered in-lieu compensation corresponding to two years’ net base salary.

Legal Principle(s)

To overturn a finding of fact by UNDT, UNAT must be satisfied that the finding is not supported by the evidence or that it is unreasonable.

Outcome

Appeal granted; Appeal granted in part

Outcome Extra Text

No relief ordered; No relief ordered.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Al Othman

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry Location :