2020-UNAT-999

2020-UNAT-999, Wilson

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered an application for correction of judgment for judgment No. 2019-UNAT-940 filed by Mr Wilson in order to reflect a correction of dates that UNDT had made to its own judgment. UNAT held that it was necessary to correct the date of the receipt of a Management Evaluation Unit response, a crucial factor for calculating time limits under the UNDT Statute, as, without the correction, the Appellant’s application to UNDT would have been not receivable ratione temporis. UNAT granted the Appellant’s application and ordered the correction of the UNAT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Mr Wilson contested his non-selection for a position. In judgment No. UNDT/2018/136, UNDT found for Mr Wilson. However, in judgment No. 2019-UNAT-940, UNAT vacated the UNDT judgment and remanded the case back to UNDT for reconsideration.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Revision, correction, interpretation or execution

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Wilson

Entity

Case Number(s)

2019-1312

Tribunal

UNAT

Registry Location :

New York

Date of Judgment