Ãå±±½ûµØ

2021-UNAT-1154

2021-UNAT-1154, Marius Russo-Got

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The UNAT concluded that Mr. Russo-Got failed to show that, in deciding the merits of his claims, the UNDT erred in fact or in law, or that its Judgment was otherwise flawed.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

UNDT/2020/194, in which UNDT rejected Mr. Russo-Got’s application challenging his non-selection for a number of positions.

Legal Principle(s)

Another request for management evaluation of the same grievance lodged by the same staff member does not stop the clock running on the calculation of the period from when the first request was made. Appointments of staff members, including by competitive selection among a group of applicants, is a matter most appropriately left to the decision of the Secretary-General’s representatives with relevant knowledge and expertise, not only in the particular field in which the recruitment is taking place, but in the field of personnel recruitment and appointment generally. The UNDT’s role is not to undertake a merits-based review of the decisions taken but is rather a jurisdictional and process review, or to substitute its decision about the appropriate appointee for that of the Administration’s experienced and knowledgeable experts. It is for the UNDT to determine its procedures, although these must conform to the principles of natural justice and, in particular, that if a party raises a new issue that the other party has not had an opportunity to address, that other party should be given an appropriate opportunity to do so.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits
Outcome Extra Text

Appeal is dismissed and UNDT Judgment affirmed

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Marius Russo-Got
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type