Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2009/002

UNDT/2009/002, Jennings

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The applicant failed to show that her case met the criteria under art. 2.2 of the Statute and art. 13 of the Rules of Procedure. Outcome: Application was rejected.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The applicant filed an application for suspension of action on decision not to renew her fixed-term appointment.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Jennings
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type