Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2010/154

UNDT/2010/154, Contreras

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

An agency relationship exists between an interview panel and a Programme Manager or Program Case Officer, such that the Programme Manager is bound by the evaluation and recommendations of the panel provided that it acts within its terms of reference. The Administration had no prerogative or power to cancel the vacancy announcement for the reasons relied upon.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Applicant was a Senior Programme Management Officer in the Global Division of Ãå±±½ûµØHabitat. On 2 August 2007, a vacancy announcement for the post of Chief, Programme Support Services was advertised, to which the Applicant applied. On 16 November 2007, the Applicant was reassigned to the Regional and Technical Cooperation Division of Ãå±±½ûµØHabitat. The vacancy announcement was subsequently cancelled and re-advertised on 17 December 2007, to which Applicant applied, was short listed and interviewed. The interview report sent to the Executive Director, UN-Habitat included the Applicant’s name as one of the five recommended candidates. Upon the request of the Executive Director, the interview panel revised its report and pared the list of five recommended candidates down to two. Applicant was not recommended to the post and was not placed on the roster for future vacancies with a similar description, hence the application before the Tribunal that the process for rostering of candidates was manipulated, violating her right to a full and fair consideration of her application to the post.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part
Outcome Extra Text

Respondent was ordered to pay Applicant six months’ net base salary as compensation as well as the requested token sum of USD1 for injury suffered in the recruitment process.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Contreras
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type