Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2011/073, Modeste

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNDT held that, in light of Order No. 62 (NY/2010) and the subsequent lack of prosecution of the proceedings, there was no matter for adjudication before the Tribunal. UNDT closed the case without a determination of its merits.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Request for a suspension of action of a decision to appoint another candidate to a post.

Legal Principle(s)

For an application for suspension of action to be successful, it must demonstrate that the impunged decision was prima facie unlawful, that it caused irreparable damage, and that there was a matter of urgency.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Modeste
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type