UNDT/2011/200

UNDT/2011/200, Di Giacomo

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Applicant filed an application, ostensibly under art. 12.2 of its Statute (regarding corrections), in relation to Di Giacomo UNDT/2011/168, by which the UNDT dismissed his case as falling outside its jurisdiction. With regard to the present application, the UNDT found that the Applicant, in fact, sought revision of Di Giacomo under art. 12.1 of the Statute, as well as correction under art. 12.2 of the Statute. The UNDT found that it had no jurisdiction to consider the present application as Di Giacomo was under appeal before the UNAT, which was therefore seized of the matter.

Legal Principle(s)

Effect of appeal, jurisdiction of the UNDT with respect to judgments under appeal: Generally, once an appeal is filed, the UNAT must be regarded as being seized of the case and the UNDT has ceased to have any jurisdiction. To have some aspect of the proceedings continuing concurrently in the trial instance would be an abuse of process.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Di Giacomo

Entity

�山��Secretariat

Case Number(s)

UNDT/NY/2010/098

Tribunal

UNDT

Registry Location :

New York