UNDT/2012/071, Gehr
UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements
Receivability/administrative decision: It would be inconsistent with its standard of review to allow the Tribunal to interfere with the review of a performance appraisal before the rebuttal process has been finalised.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant challenged the Administration’s failure to conduct a rebuttal process in relation to his 2010-2011 performance appraisal in accordance with applicable rules. He submits that the rebuttal process is tainted by irregularities and complains about the delay in finalizing the process. The Tribunal rejects the application as irreceivable on two grounds: first, because the contested decision is not a final decision subject to appeal and second, because the Applicant failed to request management evaluation.
Legal Principle(s)
N/A
Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable
Applicants/Appellants
Gehr
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type