UNDT/2012/127, Rafii
In view of the Applicant’s submission, the case was found moot and the application was dismissed. The Applicant alleged that UNAMA reneged on an undertaking made in her previous application for suspension of action in May 2012, thus frustrating her temporary engagement. The Respondent submitted that the Administration had no objections to the Applicant going on a non-reimbursable loan, and that successful efforts were made to find the Applicant a temporary assignment with the United Nations Integrated Mission in Timor-Leste (“UNMIT”). The Applicant subsequently filed a submission informing the Tribunal that she would take the temporary appointment with UNMIT in order “to fulfil [her] legal obligation to mitigate damages”. She confirmed that she would not be pursuing the present application for suspension of action but would preserve her right to pursue other remedies.
The Applicant sought suspension of action, pending management evaluation, of the alleged decision by the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (“UNAMA”) not to allow her to be employed in another office on a non-reimbursable loan.
N/A