Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2012/156

UNDT/2012/156, Vivarie

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Receivability of application for suspension of action pending management evaluation: It results from article 2.2 of the Tribunal’s Statute that the Tribunal is not in a position to rule on an application for suspension of action, pending management evaluation, on a decision, if copies of the decision in question or the request for management evaluation have not been submitted. Compliance with orders: A party to a proceeding has a duty to comply with an order of the Tribunal and particularly an interlocutory case management order pursuant to Article 19. To persist in disobeying such orders despite full explanations being provided as to their purpose will risk the claim or the response, as the case may be, being struck out.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant filed an application for suspension of action whereby he challenged a UNHCR internal memorandum, explaining that it was likely to result in his separation from service. However, he did not specify the provisions under which he was seeking suspension of action. The Tribunal found that no interim relief could be ordered either under article 2.2 or article 10.2 of its Statute. Although the Applicant was asked three times, including once by order, to transmit a copy of the contested decision as well as of his request for management evaluation, he failed to do so. No suspension of action could thus be examined/ordered under article 2.2. Further, as no application on the merits under article 2.1 had been filed by the Applicant, no interim relief could be examined/ordered under article 10.2. The Tribunal accordingly dismissed the application by summary judgment.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Vivarie
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type