Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2014/052

UNDT/2014/052, Jaffa

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Duty to report receipt of overpayments - The Applicant failed in his duty to make the Organization aware of overpayments made to him, as provided for in section 2.4 of ST/AI/2009/1. The wordings of ST/AI/2009/1 create a duty for staff members not only to report the receipt of overpayments but also to take steps to ensure their recovery. In other words, it necessarily prohibits the unauthorised prevention of said recovery. Proportionality of disciplinary sanctions - Taking into account all the mitigating factors, the sanction of termination imposed by the Respondent was not proportionate to the misconduct proved against the Applicant.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to impose on him the disciplinary measure of separation from service.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part
Outcome Extra Text

The Tribunal struck out the sanction of termination imposed on the Applicant and substituted it with the sanction of demotion with deferment for a specific period of eligibility for consideration for promotion. Should the Secretary-General decide not to perform the obligation to reinstate the Applicant with a demotion as ordered, he must in the alternative pay compensation to the Applicant in the sum of two years’ net base salary at the rate of FS4 salary in effect at the date of Judgment.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Jaffa
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type